Marcelo Calbucci

Startup Score:

Successes: 0.1+0.5
Failures: 1
In progress: 1

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Are you a CEO or a Founder? [VSP] = Very short post


This is a bit nitpick of me, or not, but I see a lot of entrepreneurs who put “CEO at XYZ” on their LinkedIn profile. That’s a big mistake in my view. It gives the impression – for some people, not all – that you are a professional manager. It’s even stranger when your previous job was “Dev Lead at Microsoft” and now it says “CEO at XYZ”. The right title should always contain the word “Founder” or “Co-Founder” (if you are one that is). So call yourself “Co-founder & CEO”.

Why? Well, I think of the CEO as the “manager” and founder as the “entrepreneur”. Missing the second part is the most common on LinkedIn profiles of startup founders. Being a founder / co-founder tells the world that you started it. Seldom have I seen just “Founder”, but sometimes I do, and this founder also being the CEO is missing a great opportunity to simplify the life of whoever is reading their bio.

Then there is the “Founder, CEO, President & Chairman of XYZ”. I guess you kind of overdid there my friend. Keep it simple “Founder & CEO” or “Co-founder & CEO” are my preferred way to describe that role (same for the CTO co-founder).

The one title that I like the least is “Co-founder & COO”. A two or three person startup having a COO is just crazy! This means the COO wanted a big title, but the CEO title was taken. If you and your co-founder CEO both have a business background (versus a product background), you guys probably have one more business person than you should on the team. Either one of you must learn and become the VP of Product (or CPO nowadays), or you better raise a lot of money fast to justify this org-chart.

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Do you feel the need to change the world through software?

EveryMove is kicking off the year with a bang! And by a “bang” I mean an incredible opportunity for me, for our team members and for a few new team members to build a very disruptive company tackling a big systemic problem around a person’s physical activity. If you are passionate about building software that makes a big impact in millions of lives, including your own, check out the job opportunities at EveryMove (and let your friends know about them as well).

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Seattle 2.0: From humble beginnings to a new home at GeekWire.

Today I’m ecstatic to announce that Seattle 2.0 has a new home: GeekWire. It’s a perfect match and you can read more on the GeekWire blog post. This is a 5-year chapter on my life, and as such, I feel the need to write a post for myself so I can read it 20 years from now and I’m sharing it with you.

It was a personal pain

When I left Microsoft to build my first startup, Seattle was lagging in online resources for tech entrepreneurs. No blogs, no online calendars, no list of lawyers or recruiters, few and far between events. After attending more NWEN Breakfasts and MITEF Dinners than a normal person should, I’ve met enough people and became clear that they were seeking the same thing I was: to build a community, share ideas and find resources. This is when in late 2006 I bought the domain seattle20.com and a few months later I was posting about events I found out that I thought would be interesting for tech entrepreneurs.

2007: List of Events & Startups

It was just a blog, with a few blog posts a week, each with a tip for an event in town. Not long after I started Seattle 2.0, John Cook compiled a list of tech startups in Seattle (at the time, 64 in total). Greg Linden, a founder of one of those startups, ranked them by their Alexa ranking and I took the idea and compiled a monthly Startup Index in Seattle, each month adding new startups, compiling the index and publishing under the brand “Seattle Startup Index”. On the first few months of the index I searched for new startups, added them to the list and compiled the rank, a very manual and boring process.

2008: Momentum & Content

Then, something happened. I didn’t have to search for events anymore. Event organizers were reaching out to me. I didn’t have to find out new startups anymore. Founders were sending their links to me. We also started to create more content on the blog, initially with me writing articles, then a few folks writing guests posts and in September of 2008, after a meeting with Alyssa Royse, we decided to create a team of blog contributors. We never paid money to anyone to write on Seattle 2.0, but we gave them something else: an audience to their voice.

It was clear that Seattle 2.0 had momentum and it was become a busy task.

2009: Awards & Beyond

Right about that time, my first startup (Sampa) was struggling to find a business model, despite the (limited) product success we had -- in a different blog post you can read that story. Danielle Morrill had joined the Seattle 2.0 contributor team and she was full of energy and boundless ideas. I remember sending an email in early 2009 to about 6 people, including Danielle, Alyssa, Andy Sack and a few others about the concept of creating an Award for the tech startup community. The email was about having fun, going to a bar and have a super informal event. In a few days, the ambition went from that to create a full-fledge Awards event. Danielle was crazy enough to go all-in with me on this endeavor. It was a stunning success. It launched Seattle 2.0 into a whole new sphere and my personal reputation as the community builder of tech startups in Seattle. I give a lot of credit for the tremendous speech Glenn Kelman delivered at that Award and for him to be fool enough to believe and support on a rookie event organizer who wanted to build a stronger community.

I actually give myself a lot less credit to the success of the Seattle 2.0 Awards than people might think. It was like people were thirsty for water and I was the truck driver who dropped a case of water bottles there. Anyone could have done it if they had seen the need and stepped up to the plate.

It’s a business! It’ll be huge!

So the time had come to abandon “just a blog” and build a bit more of a site so that I didn’t have to spend time doing manual work and possibly build Seattle 2.0 into a real business. I was just shutting down Sampa and I thought I could create a model of online content and resources and startup events, make it successful in Seattle and then expand it to other cities.

The second event I did was StartupDay. It was also an unbelievably successful for my standards. First of all, I didn’t lose money. Second, attendees, sponsors and speakers gave amazing positive comment on the event. I did many unusual things, like start the event late-ish (10:00 am), do it on a Saturday (so people didn’t have to explain at work why they were attending an event on how to build a tech startup), 20-minute talks (so the speakers were forced to deliver only the goods and none of the fillings), and build the talks in a progressive series as if you were reading a book on how to build a startup (from the “why do it?” to “when/what” to “how” to what happens afterward). Rich Barton was the closing keynote speaker and he was extremely important for the success of the event, both to bring reputation and credibility to help sell tickets, but also as an amazing keynote speaker who brought it home.

2010: It’s not for me

Between September of 2009 and January of 2010, Seattle 2.0 was my full time job, and then something unexpected happened. Remember the dream of building Seattle 2.0 into an online content/resources and events business? Yeah, I hated that business. I’m a product guy and that business was a services business. Despite the growth and early success, I was just not cut to do it. I thought I was the Melody Biringer (founder of CRAVE) of the Tech Startup world, but I was not. (BTW, Melody was critical in helping me figure out how to build successful events).

Then I decided to bring a person to run Seattle 2.0. I spent time looking for this person and on Thanksgiving or Christmas Eve 2009 (I can’t remember for sure) I went to Danielle Morrill’s house in the morning while she cooked lunch to talk about people who could run Seattle 2.0. She mentioned Jennifer Cabala, who she met through Seattle’s Social Media Club. I’ve met Jennifer once at an SMC event.

I had coffee with Jennifer and I’ve got a good feeling. Jennifer was a professional newscaster for many years, working for KING5, and she was ready for something new on her career. Jennifer didn’t have a lot of experience running a business, but I decided to make a bet. After a couple of months, Jennifer joined Seattle 2.0 full-time. In 2010 we did 3 events and expanded the site, contributors and a lot more. Jennifer brought discipline to the blog and pushed the website to be better. Turned out we weren’t able to build the business both of us wanted and at the same time Jennifer got an amazing offer to work at Startup Weekend from Marc Nager. I was an advisor to Startup Weekend and Marc and I had supported each other many times in the past. I gave Jennifer my full support on this move.

2011: No more events… Well, just a few more

So in early 2011 I was back running Seattle 2.0 while working a full-time job. I had decided not to do more events. They were very stressful and the financial risk was huge (it’s as easy to make $20K on an event as it’s to lose $20K and you don’t know where you’ll land until the week of the event after you committed yourself to it). However, I didn’t listen to myself and I decided to do the Seattle 2.0 Awards once more. Well, not really. The story is more like this: Dave Schappell sent me an email in January and asked if I had an event for Mark Suster to speak at. I told him if I did the Awards he would be great at it, and then the Awards was back on.

It’s not focused enough if you have two targets

A few weeks after I set the Seattle 2.0 Awards 2011 in motion, I joined Russell Benaroya in building EveryMove. The more I worked on EveryMove, the less time I had to Seattle 2.0. Once EveryMove joined the TechStars program, then everything went downhill for Seattle 2.0. I had no time to blog, to publish the Startup Index, to manage the job board and contributors, to promote the site, etc. I was destroying the amazing community and asset I created by neglecting it. It was painful to feel it could die. So I went on a hunt for the next CEO of Seattle 2.0, or someone who could acquire it.

The Anatomy of an Acquisition

The first offer to acquire Seattle 2.0 I received was in mid-2010. It was an OK offer, but the deal fell through a few weeks later. From mid-2010 to mid-2011 I received 3 different offers to buy Seattle 2.0. We never found the mid-point where everyone was happy. I also received some interests from people who would like to run Seattle 2.0 for me. A few of those I would never have at the helm of Seattle 2.0 because they lacked the culture fit to what I was trying to build.

In early September (a few weeks into the TechStars program), I sent an email to a few folks asking to advice on what to do. Jonathan Sposato, one of the co-founders of GeekWire and prolific entrepreneur, asked to meet with me. Jonathan and I have two (maybe three) parallels life. Jonathan was a TechStars mentor to EveryMove (now an advisor and investor). We’ve met and exchange several emails. I shared all the assets of Seattle 2.0, financials and other pertinent information. He circled back with his team and a few weeks later Jonathan said GeekWire was interested in acquiring Seattle 2.0. Once that’s done, we had to understand how the assets would be leverage by GeekWire and what value would be assigned to the acquisition. It took probably 8 weeks to do all that and we found a place where everyone was happy.
Because we were at the same page, the final contract took just a few back-and-forth to get it right. I signed it. Jonathan signed it. The deal is done.

What’s next for Seattle 2.0?

GeekWire will continue to produce and host the Seattle 2.0 Awards and StartupDay. Many of the services, resources and tools on Seattle 2.0 will be migrated to GeekWire over time. You should expect what you got on Seattle 2.0, but better, faster and more awesome. I will be involved in a limited capacity to help on a smooth transition, supporting it, and, in the interest of full disclosure, I have a financial interest over the next 3 years on the success of GeekWire.

Acknowledgements

There is no way I could have done what I did without the support and contributing work from many, many individuals. I’ll certainly miss at least a dozen folks on this post, but I must acknowledge many.

Danielle Morrill: No one has done more for Seattle 2.0 to be what it’s than Danielle. She was all-in at a time that most was critical. If Twilio hadn’t taken her from Seattle, she would likely be the CEO of Seattle 2.0 today and be expanding it to 12 different markets in 3 different countries. She’s unstoppable at building communities.

Jennifer Cabala: Jennifer took a huge risk by leaving her high-paying stable job to an uncertain low-paying position. She is a true entrepreneur because she understood the trade-off between getting a little less for a few years yet learn orders of magnitude more by doing something completely new. She took a leap for herself and for me, and I hope I didn’t disappoint her.

Dave Schappell: Dave was an unbelievable supporter. He sent a heart-felt email to STS (thousands of startup folks) pleading for them to support, sponsor, attend and promote the first Seattle 2.0 Awards. I didn’t ask for it. He just did. And since then he has been doing a significant amount of behind the scenes to make sure all the events were successful.

Alyssa Royse: Alyssa was an early inspiration for Seattle 2.0 with an unbelievable can-do attitude and gave me the courage to build the content and bring in contributors.

Andy Sack: Andy was an advisor to my first startup and we had a good relationship. But after the first Seattle 2.0 Awards in 2009, just as I was walking off the stage, Andy came to me with an enormous smile and full of joy, gave me a hug and told me how amazing the Awards were and how happy he was. After that, he has been an amazing supporter, even offering to invest on Seattle 2.0 (that never came to be because I couldn’t figure out a structure where that would make sense).

Jordana Ayer: Except by a few folks, most people on startupland don’t know my wife. But she has unknowingly sponsored and invested on Seattle 2.0 and its events, while I figure out how not to lose buckets of money on each of those events.

John Cook: John gave the inspiration to the Seattle Startup Index, which boosted our traffic to whole new levels. He could have considered Seattle 2.0 a treat and never published a link or reference to us, but he didn’t. He covered all our events (btw, his coverage of the Seattle 2.0 Awards were just freaking awesome) and helped where he could (Todd, you helped too!)

Jonathan Sposato: Maybe it’s because Jonathan got 4 out of 10 Awards during the first Seattle 2.0 Awards, but Jonathan has been a friend and supporter on multiple ways. He spoke on multiple events, made introductions when I needed and he’s an awesome gentleman.

Melody Biringer: Melody and I were together on the EO Accelerator program. She’s the founder of CRAVE, which most women reading this post probably know about, and most men never heard of. She’s a rock star at building community and events around women interests across the globe. She helped me with the basics of how to create a successful event. If it weren’t for Melody, the first Seattle 2.0 Awards would likely have been a disaster!

There are a few more folks I should thank, and I’m sorry I won’t write a paragraph why I’m thanking you, but you, I and many others know why. You spoke, sponsored or helped at one of the events. You wrote guest blog posts. You sponsored the website or other initiative. You promoted the crap of something when I need it. Or, you just told me to do it, and I did.

Many thanks to:
Aaron Franklin, Alex Algard , Alex Berg, Alex Castro, Andy Liu, Annie Eissler, Anthony Stevens , Arun Mistry, Ben Elowitz, Ben Elowitz, Ben Huh, Berry Zimmerman, Betsy Aoki, Bill Bromfield, Bill Bryant, Bob Crimmins, Boedian Lumanau, Brad Feld, Brenna Rogers, Brett Laffel, Brian Westbrook, Brier Dudley, Brook Wessel, Charlie Carter, Chris DeVore, Chris Dishman, Chris Hopf, Chris Hurley, Clay Nielsen, Colin Wong, Craig Sherman, Dan Shapiro, Dave McClure, Dave Remer, Daryn Nakhuda, David Aronchick, David Geller, David Sheldon, Don Dodge, Emily Shrock, Enrique Godreau, Eric Koester, Garry Tan, Gerry Langeler, Glenn Kelman, Greg Gottesman, Greg Linden, Hadi Partovi, Hillel Cooperman, Hiram Machado, Jacob Mullins, Jan Miksovsky, Janis Machala, Jeff Barr, Jeff Lawson, Jennifer Pitts, Jenny Lam, Jeremy Freeland, Jesse Proudman, Joe Heitzeberg, Joel Ard, Josh Petersen, Karl da Gama Campos, Keith Smith, Kelly Smith, Ken Myer, Kevin Leneway, Kevin Morrill, Konstantin Guericke, Ksenia Oustiougova, Lauren Hall-Stigerts, Lyndi Thompson, Lynn Edwards, Mark Alan Effinger, Mark Suster, Mark Tranter, Mary Abdian, Mason Boswell, Matt Hulett, Matt McIlwain, Matt Paulin, Megan Casey, Megan Muir, Mike Matieu, Mithun Dhar, Monica Harrington, Nathan Parcells, Neil Patel, Paul Gross, Paul Rusyn, Paul Shoemaker, Peter Cancelmo, Rajeev Goel, Rand Fishkin, Rashmi Sinha, Rebecca Lovell, Renate Kroll, Rich Barton, Richard Luck, Richard Vershave, Rodica Buzescu, Roy Leban, Russell Benaroya, Sasha Pasulka, Scott Oki, Scott Porad, Shannon Swift, Shauna Causey, Shayan Zadeh, Shelly Farnham, Steve Fisher, Steve Stratz, Sunny Gupta, T.A. McCann, Todd Bishop, Todd Hooper, Tolis Dimopoulos, Tony Wright, Tory Duffy, Vin Ricci, Vivek Bhaskaran and William Carleton.

Monday, November 14, 2011

Expect more, pay nothing

Well, it has been a while since I last blogged here. I've been busy with EveryMove and TechStars Demo Day and now there is a ton of other stuff happening that I can't talk about it yet. Say tuned for some great news.

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

What would have it been to live in Da Vinci and Michelangelo’s era?


500 years from now people will be wondering how it was to live in Steve Jobs era. 

It was awesome to witness it. Thanks Steve. RIP.

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Facebook: Help me help you be more successful

This week Facebook announced a truckload of innovations on their offerings, from a new news feed to the timeline, from improvements on the social graph to changes on sharing. Most of it sounds great, but I believe they are missing an enormous opportunity at redefining the web, mobile and desktop experience. In a sentence, Facebook is primarily innovating “inward” and it should be innovating mostly “outward”. Let me explain.

Let’s bring back the most successful software company of all times, Microsoft. Yes, Microsoft is known as the company that makes boatloads of money with Windows and Office, but that’s almost a consequence of a decision they made very early on their existence, and that’s to focus on empowering developers and ISVs (independent software vendors) to build the most powerful innovations on top of their backs.  I’m sure Microsoft didn’t do this to be good Samaritans, but because it made business sense.

Facebook is missing this element. Most of the partnerships they establish are “inward” trying to improve the experience inside of Facebook, all great and dandy if they put similar or great efforts outwards. This is the equivalent of Microsoft Word supporting conversion to PDF, or embedding YouTube videos on documents, or anything that improves MS Word user experience. It’s inward. The Facebook Timeline feature is inward. The news feed is inward. The frictionless sharing is inward.

Now, of course I’m taking a biased view of what Facebook should focus on. I have my own startup tapping into the powerful social graph Facebook is in control off. As such, I wish Facebook would have empowered me even more (some might say given me more rope to hang myself) to more effectively build an awesome product. The number of innovations that will come out over the next 5-10 years will outshine anything that happened in this world over the last 30 years.

Let me be more specific about what I’d like to see from Facebook that would be the catalyst for an unbelievable number of innovations:

Facebook Ads

Facebook should be aiming to Google’s jugular right about now. They have the attention of brands and advertisers. They should launch their own version of Google Adsense. Publishers are very frustrated (probably for the last 4 years) with Google Adsense because of poor performance and ever lower CPCs. In addition, from experience, Adsense doesn’t play well with content behind a sign in screen. Facebook could today launch the tag and send a shockwave on the web. I’d try Facebook Ads in a split second. Particularly if I have some controls about the type of ads (based on the interest graph) that should appear on my site.

Facebook Payment

Raise your hand if you love PayPal! … Bueller? … I’m not talking about the goddamn awful UI, or incredibly slow search features, or the fact that PayPal is quite unfriendly to setup and install on your site. I biggest issue with PayPal is that it’s focused on their own success at converting a user than the success of their money-receiver users at getting paid. Here’s the thing about Facebook: They get how to build incredibly simple to integrate, nearly frictionless experiences. I can easily see how a Facebook Payment system would be fantastic, even enabling one-click (err, two-clicks to avoid a lawsuit) “Buy This” or “Subscribe Now” or whatever I want to do on my site. Most people are already logged in to Facebook all the time, and users don’t lose their FB password as often as people seem to lose their PayPal password.

Facebook Intelligent Open Graph

The Open Graph is awesome. I use it. It’s amazing I can get a few dozen data points from an individual by her just clicking “Join using Facebook Connect”. But I want more! I want one hundred or more new APIs from Facebook that enables me to do things I could never do own my own. Just is just the tip of the Iceberg, but I wish Facebook would provide a Facial recognition API (upload a picture and tell me who’s in it). Or an API that tells me about the user’s friends: who is a family member? Who are the people I went to college with? Who are the people I exchange more ‘likes’ with? Who are the people who live closest to me? Or, how about better Geo APIs? Popular destinations near a place? Places a user’s friends have been more often too? Facebook has not only a trove of data; it has a trove of technology that can be productized. Think of the transition that Amazon went through to provide all the Cloud Computing services. Facebook can provide a lot of interesting value. BTW, I’d pay!

The bottom line is pretty simple: the current strategy by Mark Zuckerberg is based on how much data he can get from you and how many hours a day you spend on Facebook.com. The first part is absolutely fine with me; the second part is where I’m challenging Mark to rethink. Think at how Facebook will be an indispensable component of thousands of new companies.

Monday, August 29, 2011

Looking for an experienced developer to join a startup

Short and sweet: EveryMove is looking to hire an experienced and awesome developer to join our efforts at making the world a better place. EveryMove is a funded startup in Seattle tackling a big problem. Our development stack is Microsoft (C#, .NET, MVC/Razor, SQL, jQuery).

If you know anyone point them to this blog post:
http://blog.everymove.org/2011/08/everymove-is-looking-for-sr-developer.html

Please, share this with your friends, colleagues, disgruntled employees, etc.